L4M1 無料問題集「CIPS Scope and Influence of Procurement and Supply」
Explain the impact that having a Corporate Governance Framework can have on the policies and processes of the procurement department (25 points)
正解：
See the solution in Explanation part below.
Explanation:
A basic response would include:
- What a Corporate Governance Framework is - the system of rules, practices and processes which directs and controls a company. Corporate Governance refers to the way in which companies are governed and to what purpose.
- Impact this has on policies and processes - means the procurement department follows regulatory mechanisms (e.g. financial regulations, Codes of Practices), has a checks and balances system (such as auditing), uses e-procurement technologies, vets staff and suppliers, has a clear segregation of duties etc.
This is a very open question and there are so many correct answers. In fact, it's quite hard to give a wrong answer to this question - as long as your response explains a policy or process that a procurement department can have that ensures they're following Corporate Governance - that's right!
A good response may mention:
- Corporate governance is in essence a 'toolkit' that allows an organisation to effectively manage itself, ensuring that it's policies and procedures are compliant with legislation and are ethical. It also ensures that the company meets its objectives.
- The impact Corporate Governance has on the procurement department will be in mandating the ways in which goods and services are procured and in the general ways of working of the procurement department.
- In your response you should mention 5 (ish) different ways Corporate Governance would impact on how procurement do their job. Examples include:
- Ethical Conduct - corporate governance ensures that the company is operating in a legal and ethical way.
This influences the processes Procurement will do and the type of suppliers they will engage with. This may also be in their approach to relationships and negotiations- seeking out collaborative relationships with suppliers rather than looking to exploit them. For example, an organisation that does not have a Corporate Governance structure may look to take advantage of suppliers and achieve the lowest cost possible at the expense of the supply chain and local community. An organisation that has strong Corporate Governance would work with suppliers, developing the relationships and thinking long-term about the impact on the local community. The organisation may therefore prioritisestandards such as Fair Trade over price, and this would be reflected in the way tenders are evaluated by the procurement department.
- Use of Checks and Balance system- Corporate Governance ensures strong financial controls are implemented throughout the organisation. For the procurement department this may result in purchases being made to strict budgets (rather than just spending whatever they want), and business cases being written up and approved before the organisation spends a large amount of money on a single item. Another impact may be in the use of audits. For example, peer reviewing tenders and contract awards to ensue all members of the Procurement Team are following internal processes correctly.
- Anti-fraud prevention mechanisms. An important area of Corporate Governance is ensuring the organisation is free from fraud and corruption. This impacts on Procurement's policies and processes as it will mean scrutinising tenders and who is being awarded contracts. It may result in high levels of Due Diligence being completed on suppliers before entering into contracts and providing a whistle-blowing service for staff to report issues.
- Security measures- this will be to protect the organisation from risk. It may include the procurement department vetting new staff by completing background checks. It may also involve the segregation of procurement duties so that no individual has too much power. E.g. one person raises the requisition and another person approves the purchase. Security may also be in ways of working such as password protecting documentation and limiting access to confidential information.
- Use of a Purchasing Policy Manual - this provides operational guidance on procurement policies and procedures to all staff members. It may detail things like who has permission to order what, who the Delegated Purchasing Authority (DPA) is and the roles and responsibilities of the team.
An excellent response may also include
- Reasons why Corporate Governance Frameworks impact on procurement policies and practices. This could include reasons of accountability, reputation and risk management, procurement's links with other departments.
- You could also look at what processes would look like with Corporate Governance compared to without it (with CG = rule driven, autocratic but organisation is protected from risk. Without CG = laissez-faire, everyone does whatever they like, very risky)
- You could also provide further examples, either real life or hypothetical. Investopedia has some great information and examples you could use: Corporate Governance Definition: How It Works (investopedia.com)
Explanation:
A basic response would include:
- What a Corporate Governance Framework is - the system of rules, practices and processes which directs and controls a company. Corporate Governance refers to the way in which companies are governed and to what purpose.
- Impact this has on policies and processes - means the procurement department follows regulatory mechanisms (e.g. financial regulations, Codes of Practices), has a checks and balances system (such as auditing), uses e-procurement technologies, vets staff and suppliers, has a clear segregation of duties etc.
This is a very open question and there are so many correct answers. In fact, it's quite hard to give a wrong answer to this question - as long as your response explains a policy or process that a procurement department can have that ensures they're following Corporate Governance - that's right!
A good response may mention:
- Corporate governance is in essence a 'toolkit' that allows an organisation to effectively manage itself, ensuring that it's policies and procedures are compliant with legislation and are ethical. It also ensures that the company meets its objectives.
- The impact Corporate Governance has on the procurement department will be in mandating the ways in which goods and services are procured and in the general ways of working of the procurement department.
- In your response you should mention 5 (ish) different ways Corporate Governance would impact on how procurement do their job. Examples include:
- Ethical Conduct - corporate governance ensures that the company is operating in a legal and ethical way.
This influences the processes Procurement will do and the type of suppliers they will engage with. This may also be in their approach to relationships and negotiations- seeking out collaborative relationships with suppliers rather than looking to exploit them. For example, an organisation that does not have a Corporate Governance structure may look to take advantage of suppliers and achieve the lowest cost possible at the expense of the supply chain and local community. An organisation that has strong Corporate Governance would work with suppliers, developing the relationships and thinking long-term about the impact on the local community. The organisation may therefore prioritisestandards such as Fair Trade over price, and this would be reflected in the way tenders are evaluated by the procurement department.
- Use of Checks and Balance system- Corporate Governance ensures strong financial controls are implemented throughout the organisation. For the procurement department this may result in purchases being made to strict budgets (rather than just spending whatever they want), and business cases being written up and approved before the organisation spends a large amount of money on a single item. Another impact may be in the use of audits. For example, peer reviewing tenders and contract awards to ensue all members of the Procurement Team are following internal processes correctly.
- Anti-fraud prevention mechanisms. An important area of Corporate Governance is ensuring the organisation is free from fraud and corruption. This impacts on Procurement's policies and processes as it will mean scrutinising tenders and who is being awarded contracts. It may result in high levels of Due Diligence being completed on suppliers before entering into contracts and providing a whistle-blowing service for staff to report issues.
- Security measures- this will be to protect the organisation from risk. It may include the procurement department vetting new staff by completing background checks. It may also involve the segregation of procurement duties so that no individual has too much power. E.g. one person raises the requisition and another person approves the purchase. Security may also be in ways of working such as password protecting documentation and limiting access to confidential information.
- Use of a Purchasing Policy Manual - this provides operational guidance on procurement policies and procedures to all staff members. It may detail things like who has permission to order what, who the Delegated Purchasing Authority (DPA) is and the roles and responsibilities of the team.
An excellent response may also include
- Reasons why Corporate Governance Frameworks impact on procurement policies and practices. This could include reasons of accountability, reputation and risk management, procurement's links with other departments.
- You could also look at what processes would look like with Corporate Governance compared to without it (with CG = rule driven, autocratic but organisation is protected from risk. Without CG = laissez-faire, everyone does whatever they like, very risky)
- You could also provide further examples, either real life or hypothetical. Investopedia has some great information and examples you could use: Corporate Governance Definition: How It Works (investopedia.com)
What is a Public Sector organisation and what are the main objectives of organisations in the Public Sector?
(25 points)
(25 points)
正解：
See the solution in Explanation part below.
Explanation:
How to approach this question
- For the first part of the question you should look to give a definition of the public sector, think about it's characteristics and give so examples e.g. local government, hospitals, libraries.
- For the second part try to explain 4-5 objectives. Try to remain as broad as you can - think about objectives that all public sector organisations have in common rather than anything very specific to one organisation, what the question is looking for is the higher level, more broad aims.
Example Essay
A public sector organization, is a branch of government responsible for providing a wide range of services and functions to citizens and communities. It is funded by taxpayers' money and operates under governmental authority at various levels, including federal, state, and local governments. Public sector organizations can encompass government departments, agencies, authorities, and public enterprises. The main objectives of these organizations are multifaceted, aimed at serving the public interest and ensuring the efficient functioning of society. Examples include hospitals, schools and libraries. In this essay, we will explore the primary objectives of public sector organizations: improving services, achieving value for money, supporting communities and social value, and promoting equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI).
Improving Services:
One of the central objectives of public sector organizations is to enhance the quality and accessibility of services provided to the public. These services can range from healthcare and education to transportation and public safety. The focus is on improving the well-being of citizens by ensuring that essential services are accessible, efficient, and responsive to evolving societal needs. For example, public healthcare systems aim to deliver high-quality medical services to all citizens, striving to reduce health disparities and provide equitable care.
Value for Money:
Public sector organizations are entrusted with the responsible and efficient use of public funds. Achieving value for money is a critical objective, ensuring that taxpayer money is spent wisely and that resources are allocated efficiently. Government agencies are tasked with optimizing budgets, reducing waste, and delivering services in a cost-effective manner. For instance, public infrastructure projects must be designed and executed to maximize benefits while minimizing costs and delays.
Supporting Communities and Social Value:
Public sector organizations play a pivotal role in supporting communities and generating social value. This objective involves initiatives and policies aimed at fostering community well-being, economic development, and social cohesion. It includes activities such as urban planning, affordable housing initiatives, and community development programs. By focusing on supporting communities, public sector organizations contribute to the overall betterment of society, creating opportunities and improving the quality of life for residents. In the UK it is a legal requirement for all large public sector contracts to consider Social Value, in line with the Social Value Act 2012.
Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI):
Promoting equality, diversity, and inclusion is another fundamental objective of public sector organizations.
These organizations are tasked with ensuring that all citizens are treated fairly and have equal access to opportunities and services. This objective encompasses anti-discrimination policies, diversity hiring practices, and programs that address societal inequalities. Public sector entities strive to create environments where individuals of diverse backgrounds can thrive and participate fully in public life, regardless of race, gender, age, disability, or other characteristics.
In conclusion, public sector organizations serve as key agents in addressing societal needs and promoting the common good. Their objectives encompass improving services,achieving value for money, supporting communities and social value, and promoting equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI). By pursuing these objectives, public sector organizations contribute to the welfare and development of society, ensuring that public resources are utilized efficiently and equitably. They play a vital role in shaping the overall well-being and progress of their respective communities and nations.
Tutor Notes
- The study guide talks about the main objective of the public sector as being 'to improve services'. This is true, but in reality, the public sector may be the only people providing that service. They may be providing a service that the private sector can't or won't because it's simply not profitable. An example is the Forestry Commission which looks at protecting forests and conducting research on forests. No private sector organisation is going to do that because there's simply no money in it.
- With a lot of public sector organisations there are competing private sector organisations, just look at medical care and the rise of private health insurance. Same with transport. This essay doesn't ask you to talk about this, and it is outside of the scope of the study guide but it's an interesting observation: traditionally the aim of the public sector was to serve the public, nowadays it's actually competing with private sector organisations to do this!
- Social Value Act for anyone who's not familiar: Social Value Act: information and resources - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
Explanation:
How to approach this question
- For the first part of the question you should look to give a definition of the public sector, think about it's characteristics and give so examples e.g. local government, hospitals, libraries.
- For the second part try to explain 4-5 objectives. Try to remain as broad as you can - think about objectives that all public sector organisations have in common rather than anything very specific to one organisation, what the question is looking for is the higher level, more broad aims.
Example Essay
A public sector organization, is a branch of government responsible for providing a wide range of services and functions to citizens and communities. It is funded by taxpayers' money and operates under governmental authority at various levels, including federal, state, and local governments. Public sector organizations can encompass government departments, agencies, authorities, and public enterprises. The main objectives of these organizations are multifaceted, aimed at serving the public interest and ensuring the efficient functioning of society. Examples include hospitals, schools and libraries. In this essay, we will explore the primary objectives of public sector organizations: improving services, achieving value for money, supporting communities and social value, and promoting equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI).
Improving Services:
One of the central objectives of public sector organizations is to enhance the quality and accessibility of services provided to the public. These services can range from healthcare and education to transportation and public safety. The focus is on improving the well-being of citizens by ensuring that essential services are accessible, efficient, and responsive to evolving societal needs. For example, public healthcare systems aim to deliver high-quality medical services to all citizens, striving to reduce health disparities and provide equitable care.
Value for Money:
Public sector organizations are entrusted with the responsible and efficient use of public funds. Achieving value for money is a critical objective, ensuring that taxpayer money is spent wisely and that resources are allocated efficiently. Government agencies are tasked with optimizing budgets, reducing waste, and delivering services in a cost-effective manner. For instance, public infrastructure projects must be designed and executed to maximize benefits while minimizing costs and delays.
Supporting Communities and Social Value:
Public sector organizations play a pivotal role in supporting communities and generating social value. This objective involves initiatives and policies aimed at fostering community well-being, economic development, and social cohesion. It includes activities such as urban planning, affordable housing initiatives, and community development programs. By focusing on supporting communities, public sector organizations contribute to the overall betterment of society, creating opportunities and improving the quality of life for residents. In the UK it is a legal requirement for all large public sector contracts to consider Social Value, in line with the Social Value Act 2012.
Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI):
Promoting equality, diversity, and inclusion is another fundamental objective of public sector organizations.
These organizations are tasked with ensuring that all citizens are treated fairly and have equal access to opportunities and services. This objective encompasses anti-discrimination policies, diversity hiring practices, and programs that address societal inequalities. Public sector entities strive to create environments where individuals of diverse backgrounds can thrive and participate fully in public life, regardless of race, gender, age, disability, or other characteristics.
In conclusion, public sector organizations serve as key agents in addressing societal needs and promoting the common good. Their objectives encompass improving services,achieving value for money, supporting communities and social value, and promoting equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI). By pursuing these objectives, public sector organizations contribute to the welfare and development of society, ensuring that public resources are utilized efficiently and equitably. They play a vital role in shaping the overall well-being and progress of their respective communities and nations.
Tutor Notes
- The study guide talks about the main objective of the public sector as being 'to improve services'. This is true, but in reality, the public sector may be the only people providing that service. They may be providing a service that the private sector can't or won't because it's simply not profitable. An example is the Forestry Commission which looks at protecting forests and conducting research on forests. No private sector organisation is going to do that because there's simply no money in it.
- With a lot of public sector organisations there are competing private sector organisations, just look at medical care and the rise of private health insurance. Same with transport. This essay doesn't ask you to talk about this, and it is outside of the scope of the study guide but it's an interesting observation: traditionally the aim of the public sector was to serve the public, nowadays it's actually competing with private sector organisations to do this!
- Social Value Act for anyone who's not familiar: Social Value Act: information and resources - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
Mo is the new Head of Procurement at Manufacturer X. Manufacturer X is a small organisation which creates bespoke robots for clients. Their supply chain is complex, sourcing many components from various suppliers.
Mo has joined the company at a pivotal time of growth. The company wishes to expand the procurement department and formalise its policies. Discuss 5 areas that Mo should consider when drafting the department's policies and manuals (25 points).
Mo has joined the company at a pivotal time of growth. The company wishes to expand the procurement department and formalise its policies. Discuss 5 areas that Mo should consider when drafting the department's policies and manuals (25 points).
正解：
See the solution in Explanation part below.
Explanation:
How to approach this question
- Remember as you're preparing an essay plan that this is a case study question, meaning everything has to relate back to Mo and Manufacturer X. So for the 5 areas- think about how this would be applicable for a robotics manufacturer. CIPS don't expect you to knowanything about robotics so if you talk about KPIs for suppliers- just make them up- as long as they sound right-ish that's all that matters.
- Areas you could talk about include: competition, ethics, KPIs, quality, supplier appraisal, supplier evaluation, sustainability, transparency Example Essay Mo, stepping into the role of Head of Procurement at Manufacturer X during a pivotal period of growth, faces the task of expanding the department and formalizing its policies. In this intricate landscape of a small organization creating bespoke robots, five crucial areas demand Mo's careful consideration in the drafting of departmental policies and manuals: competition, ethics, quality, supplier evaluation, and sustainability.
Firstly, competition. As Manufacturer X navigates growth, Mo must establish transparent guidelines for competitive bidding processes. It is imperative to ensure fairness in supplier selection and implement strategies for cost competitiveness without compromising quality. Encouraging innovation and collaboration with suppliers becomes a strategic approach to gain a competitive edge in the market. Mo should be careful that his policies do not favour any suppliers over others and that consideration is given to allowing SMEs to bid for work.
Secondly, Ethics. Mo needs to develop an explicit code of ethics guiding procurement professionals in their interactions. This should emphasize honesty, integrity, and fair treatment. Additionally, establishing due diligence procedures to ensure suppliers adhere to ethical business practices, especially concerning labour and environmental standards is important. Moreover, whistleblower protection mechanisms should be put in place to encourage the reporting of ethical concerns without fear of reprisal.
Thirdly, Quality considerations. Given the bespoke nature of the robotics industry and the necessity of maintaining high standards for customer satisfaction, Mo must define and communicate stringent quality requirements to suppliers, emphasizing adherence to specifications and standards. The establishment of robust inspection and testing procedures at various stages of the supply chain is crucial, ensuring consistent component quality. Developing contingency plans and protocols for addressing quality issues promptly, including collaboration with suppliers for continuous improvement, should be integrated.
With the organization's growth, a systematic approach to supplier evaluation becomes paramount. Mo needs to develop a comprehensive evaluation framework, including criteria such as financial stability, reliability, and past performance. Implementing a supplier scorecard system is essential for tracking and assessing supplier performance over time. Moreover, fostering strategic relationships with key suppliers to promote collaboration, innovation, and long-term partnerships becomes a strategic imperative.
Lastly, Mo should consider sustainability, in particular environmental awareness and the promotion of sustainable practices into the supply chain for long-term viability. Developing sustainability criteria for supplier selection, considering factors such as environmental impact, social responsibility, and ethical sourcing, is imperative. Encouraging suppliers to adopt environmentally friendly practices and certifications, such as ISO14001 or Fair Trade, becomes crucial. The integration of sustainability goals into procurement key performance indicators (KPIs) is essential for tracking progress and demonstrating the organization's commitment to corporate responsibility.
In conclusion, Mo's strategic focus on competition, ethics, quality, supplier evaluation, and sustainability is pivotal in laying the foundation for a procurement department that not only supports Manufacturer X's growth, but also aligns with its values and industry standards.This approach positions the organization for success in the dynamic landscape of bespoke robot manufacturing.
Tutor Notes
- This question is taken from P. 146 - note the question is on policies not strategy. These are slightly different concepts, but they do overlap. Policies are black and white- we do this and we don't do that. Strategies are about what the company wants to achieve. They're future orientated, where as a policy is about what we do now. So a policy may include sustainability, but strategy may talk about reducing pollution.
- CIPS could also ask you to talk about procurement strategies such as achieving cost reductions, environmental issues etc. These are also on p.146
Explanation:
How to approach this question
- Remember as you're preparing an essay plan that this is a case study question, meaning everything has to relate back to Mo and Manufacturer X. So for the 5 areas- think about how this would be applicable for a robotics manufacturer. CIPS don't expect you to knowanything about robotics so if you talk about KPIs for suppliers- just make them up- as long as they sound right-ish that's all that matters.
- Areas you could talk about include: competition, ethics, KPIs, quality, supplier appraisal, supplier evaluation, sustainability, transparency Example Essay Mo, stepping into the role of Head of Procurement at Manufacturer X during a pivotal period of growth, faces the task of expanding the department and formalizing its policies. In this intricate landscape of a small organization creating bespoke robots, five crucial areas demand Mo's careful consideration in the drafting of departmental policies and manuals: competition, ethics, quality, supplier evaluation, and sustainability.
Firstly, competition. As Manufacturer X navigates growth, Mo must establish transparent guidelines for competitive bidding processes. It is imperative to ensure fairness in supplier selection and implement strategies for cost competitiveness without compromising quality. Encouraging innovation and collaboration with suppliers becomes a strategic approach to gain a competitive edge in the market. Mo should be careful that his policies do not favour any suppliers over others and that consideration is given to allowing SMEs to bid for work.
Secondly, Ethics. Mo needs to develop an explicit code of ethics guiding procurement professionals in their interactions. This should emphasize honesty, integrity, and fair treatment. Additionally, establishing due diligence procedures to ensure suppliers adhere to ethical business practices, especially concerning labour and environmental standards is important. Moreover, whistleblower protection mechanisms should be put in place to encourage the reporting of ethical concerns without fear of reprisal.
Thirdly, Quality considerations. Given the bespoke nature of the robotics industry and the necessity of maintaining high standards for customer satisfaction, Mo must define and communicate stringent quality requirements to suppliers, emphasizing adherence to specifications and standards. The establishment of robust inspection and testing procedures at various stages of the supply chain is crucial, ensuring consistent component quality. Developing contingency plans and protocols for addressing quality issues promptly, including collaboration with suppliers for continuous improvement, should be integrated.
With the organization's growth, a systematic approach to supplier evaluation becomes paramount. Mo needs to develop a comprehensive evaluation framework, including criteria such as financial stability, reliability, and past performance. Implementing a supplier scorecard system is essential for tracking and assessing supplier performance over time. Moreover, fostering strategic relationships with key suppliers to promote collaboration, innovation, and long-term partnerships becomes a strategic imperative.
Lastly, Mo should consider sustainability, in particular environmental awareness and the promotion of sustainable practices into the supply chain for long-term viability. Developing sustainability criteria for supplier selection, considering factors such as environmental impact, social responsibility, and ethical sourcing, is imperative. Encouraging suppliers to adopt environmentally friendly practices and certifications, such as ISO14001 or Fair Trade, becomes crucial. The integration of sustainability goals into procurement key performance indicators (KPIs) is essential for tracking progress and demonstrating the organization's commitment to corporate responsibility.
In conclusion, Mo's strategic focus on competition, ethics, quality, supplier evaluation, and sustainability is pivotal in laying the foundation for a procurement department that not only supports Manufacturer X's growth, but also aligns with its values and industry standards.This approach positions the organization for success in the dynamic landscape of bespoke robot manufacturing.
Tutor Notes
- This question is taken from P. 146 - note the question is on policies not strategy. These are slightly different concepts, but they do overlap. Policies are black and white- we do this and we don't do that. Strategies are about what the company wants to achieve. They're future orientated, where as a policy is about what we do now. So a policy may include sustainability, but strategy may talk about reducing pollution.
- CIPS could also ask you to talk about procurement strategies such as achieving cost reductions, environmental issues etc. These are also on p.146
In the supplier selection part of the Procurement Cycle, what criteria can a Procurement Manager use to ensure they award to the best supplier? (25 points)
正解：
See the solution in Explanation part below.
Explanation:
How to approach this question:
- This is quite an open question and there are many different things you could mention. One way to approach it would be to use Carter's 10 Cs- discuss a couple of these. OR just give a couple of criteria in different paragraphs. Some ideas include: Supplier financial status, Reputation / References, Quality, Availability, CSR Policies / Ethics / Environmental considerations, Accreditations, Added Value. This list is not exhaustive.
- If you're going for Carter's 10 Cs you could name a couple of these: competency, consistency, capability, control, cost, cash, clean, communication, culture, commitment
- I don't think either approach is better or worse. Choose the criteria you know the most about and write about those.
- The question doesn't tell you how many criteria to name, so you have to make a judgement call here. I would aim for 5-6. But if you can only remember 4 that's fine. The main thing they're looking for is that you explain for each one 1) what it is 2) how procurement can check 3) why procurement would look at that criteria 4) an example. If you do too many you risk not going into enough detail on each. It's a balance. 5 is always a good number to aim for if the question doesn't state.
Example Essay
In the procurement cycle, the supplier selection phase is a critical juncture that demands consideration.
Procurement Managers shoulder the responsibility of identifying and awarding contracts to suppliers who not only meet immediate needs, but contribute to the long-term success of the organization. This essay explores various criteria a Procurement Manager can employ to ensure the selection of the best supplier: financial stability, reputation, quality, availability, CSR policies, and added value.
Financial stability is a foundational criterion in supplier selection. Assessing a supplier's financial status involves a multifaceted evaluation, with liquidity and gearing ratio taking center stage. The acid test, comparing short-term assets to liabilities, offers insights into a supplier's ability to settle debts promptly, with a ratio exceeding 1 indicating financial health. Meanwhile, the gearing ratio, reflecting the proportion of capital funded by loans,aids in gauging financial risk, with a ratio below 50% considered low-risk. Relying on published Profit and Loss statements and income statements, along with financial credit checks from platforms like Dun and Bradstreet, empowers Procurement Managers to make informed decisions. This financial scrutiny is imperative to avoid entering contracts with suppliers facing imminent financial struggles, safeguarding against potential disruptions to the supply chain.
Reputation and references are another pivotal criterion. Seeking references from previous contracts allows Procurement Managers to gauge a supplier's track record in successfully delivering on similar commitments.
Independent reviews and informal market inquiries supplement this information, providing a holistic understanding of a supplier's performance. However, caution is advised in overreliance on past performance, as variables like personnel changes or contract scale differences may impact outcomes. Recognizing that past shortcomings may have been addressed internally further emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to reference evaluation.
Thirdly, Quality. Beyond the product itself, considerations extend to the supplier's technological capabilities, manufacturing processes, and relevant accreditations such as ISO 9001. Physical visits to supplier sites may be warranted, especially for products like raw materials where samples can be requested. Adhering to recognized safety standards and assessing factors like fire retardancy ensures that the quality of manufactured goods aligns with established benchmarks.
Next, Availability is another important criteria to consider. Procurement Managers must evaluate a supplier's capacity and capability to meet specific requirements. Inquiries about existing contracts and flexibility in response to demand fluctuations provide insights into a supplier's commitment and responsiveness. Assessing the supplier's workload and the significance of the buyer in their client portfolio helps determine the level of attention and service the buyer can expect. A buyer may wish to avoid working for a supplier who is already stretched very thinly with other contracts.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policies and ethical considerations have gained prominence in supplier selection. Beyond legal compliance, Procurement Managers may scrutinize a supplier's history for convictions or negative press related to corruption, bribery, or fraud. The presence of a Modern Slavery Policy and Environmental Policy, along with relevant accreditations like ISO14001 or Fair Trade certification, attests to a supplier's commitment to ethical and sustainable practices. Procurement would likely seek to appoint a supplier who's CSR vision aligns with their own company's.
Lastly, added value is an important criteria to consider. This is particularly so for Public Sector Organizations governed by the Social Value Act. In addition to meeting contractual requirements, suppliers may offer knowledge sharing, training, improved processes, or contribute to social value by employing local community members or providing apprenticeships. This criterion aligns procurement decisions with broader organizational goals, enhancing the overall impact of supplier relationships and benefitting the local community.
In conclusion, a careful combination of financial scrutiny, reputation assessment, quality evaluation, availability considerations, CSR policies, and added value analysis forms the bedrock of effective supplier selection in the procurement cycle. Procurement Managers, armed with a holistic understanding of these criteria, should seek not only to fulfil immediate needs, but also consider the long-term impact of supplier appointments.
Tutor Notes
- A 'good' scoring answer (50-70%) will explain the criteria well and give examples. If you're looking for a distinction level answer (70% +) you could also mention advantages, disadvantages and risks associated with each of the criteria. For example, when looking at references and reputation it's important to know that a supplier would only ever provide a good reference to you, they would never tell you of a contract that failed.
Another example is that financial data may be skewed- a supplier may have a low score if they are just starting up or have recently remortgaged a property. It's therefore important to get a commentary as well as the figures / scores.
- You could also mention that criteria could be weighted e.g. more importance given to quality than financial status and also consider how easy or difficult it would be to get the information e.g. a supplier may say they have lots of availability to deliver the service you require, but they may just be saying this to win business.
How do you know for sure?
- Social Value Act isn't in this syllabus. If you work in Public Sector procurement it's something you'll be very familiar with. If you don't or you're outside of the UK do not worry about this. I've just included it to show how you can bring in your own knowledge to questions like this. You could think of particular criteria that's important to your industry and write about that. The Social Value Act: What is it, and why is it important? (samtaler.co.uk)
- Study guide p.77
Explanation:
How to approach this question:
- This is quite an open question and there are many different things you could mention. One way to approach it would be to use Carter's 10 Cs- discuss a couple of these. OR just give a couple of criteria in different paragraphs. Some ideas include: Supplier financial status, Reputation / References, Quality, Availability, CSR Policies / Ethics / Environmental considerations, Accreditations, Added Value. This list is not exhaustive.
- If you're going for Carter's 10 Cs you could name a couple of these: competency, consistency, capability, control, cost, cash, clean, communication, culture, commitment
- I don't think either approach is better or worse. Choose the criteria you know the most about and write about those.
- The question doesn't tell you how many criteria to name, so you have to make a judgement call here. I would aim for 5-6. But if you can only remember 4 that's fine. The main thing they're looking for is that you explain for each one 1) what it is 2) how procurement can check 3) why procurement would look at that criteria 4) an example. If you do too many you risk not going into enough detail on each. It's a balance. 5 is always a good number to aim for if the question doesn't state.
Example Essay
In the procurement cycle, the supplier selection phase is a critical juncture that demands consideration.
Procurement Managers shoulder the responsibility of identifying and awarding contracts to suppliers who not only meet immediate needs, but contribute to the long-term success of the organization. This essay explores various criteria a Procurement Manager can employ to ensure the selection of the best supplier: financial stability, reputation, quality, availability, CSR policies, and added value.
Financial stability is a foundational criterion in supplier selection. Assessing a supplier's financial status involves a multifaceted evaluation, with liquidity and gearing ratio taking center stage. The acid test, comparing short-term assets to liabilities, offers insights into a supplier's ability to settle debts promptly, with a ratio exceeding 1 indicating financial health. Meanwhile, the gearing ratio, reflecting the proportion of capital funded by loans,aids in gauging financial risk, with a ratio below 50% considered low-risk. Relying on published Profit and Loss statements and income statements, along with financial credit checks from platforms like Dun and Bradstreet, empowers Procurement Managers to make informed decisions. This financial scrutiny is imperative to avoid entering contracts with suppliers facing imminent financial struggles, safeguarding against potential disruptions to the supply chain.
Reputation and references are another pivotal criterion. Seeking references from previous contracts allows Procurement Managers to gauge a supplier's track record in successfully delivering on similar commitments.
Independent reviews and informal market inquiries supplement this information, providing a holistic understanding of a supplier's performance. However, caution is advised in overreliance on past performance, as variables like personnel changes or contract scale differences may impact outcomes. Recognizing that past shortcomings may have been addressed internally further emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to reference evaluation.
Thirdly, Quality. Beyond the product itself, considerations extend to the supplier's technological capabilities, manufacturing processes, and relevant accreditations such as ISO 9001. Physical visits to supplier sites may be warranted, especially for products like raw materials where samples can be requested. Adhering to recognized safety standards and assessing factors like fire retardancy ensures that the quality of manufactured goods aligns with established benchmarks.
Next, Availability is another important criteria to consider. Procurement Managers must evaluate a supplier's capacity and capability to meet specific requirements. Inquiries about existing contracts and flexibility in response to demand fluctuations provide insights into a supplier's commitment and responsiveness. Assessing the supplier's workload and the significance of the buyer in their client portfolio helps determine the level of attention and service the buyer can expect. A buyer may wish to avoid working for a supplier who is already stretched very thinly with other contracts.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policies and ethical considerations have gained prominence in supplier selection. Beyond legal compliance, Procurement Managers may scrutinize a supplier's history for convictions or negative press related to corruption, bribery, or fraud. The presence of a Modern Slavery Policy and Environmental Policy, along with relevant accreditations like ISO14001 or Fair Trade certification, attests to a supplier's commitment to ethical and sustainable practices. Procurement would likely seek to appoint a supplier who's CSR vision aligns with their own company's.
Lastly, added value is an important criteria to consider. This is particularly so for Public Sector Organizations governed by the Social Value Act. In addition to meeting contractual requirements, suppliers may offer knowledge sharing, training, improved processes, or contribute to social value by employing local community members or providing apprenticeships. This criterion aligns procurement decisions with broader organizational goals, enhancing the overall impact of supplier relationships and benefitting the local community.
In conclusion, a careful combination of financial scrutiny, reputation assessment, quality evaluation, availability considerations, CSR policies, and added value analysis forms the bedrock of effective supplier selection in the procurement cycle. Procurement Managers, armed with a holistic understanding of these criteria, should seek not only to fulfil immediate needs, but also consider the long-term impact of supplier appointments.
Tutor Notes
- A 'good' scoring answer (50-70%) will explain the criteria well and give examples. If you're looking for a distinction level answer (70% +) you could also mention advantages, disadvantages and risks associated with each of the criteria. For example, when looking at references and reputation it's important to know that a supplier would only ever provide a good reference to you, they would never tell you of a contract that failed.
Another example is that financial data may be skewed- a supplier may have a low score if they are just starting up or have recently remortgaged a property. It's therefore important to get a commentary as well as the figures / scores.
- You could also mention that criteria could be weighted e.g. more importance given to quality than financial status and also consider how easy or difficult it would be to get the information e.g. a supplier may say they have lots of availability to deliver the service you require, but they may just be saying this to win business.
How do you know for sure?
- Social Value Act isn't in this syllabus. If you work in Public Sector procurement it's something you'll be very familiar with. If you don't or you're outside of the UK do not worry about this. I've just included it to show how you can bring in your own knowledge to questions like this. You could think of particular criteria that's important to your industry and write about that. The Social Value Act: What is it, and why is it important? (samtaler.co.uk)
- Study guide p.77