MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I 無料問題集「Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Integration Architect I」

Refer to the exhibit.

A Mule 4 application has a parent flow that breaks up a JSON array payload into 200 separate items, then sends each item one at a time inside an Async scope to a VM queue.
A second flow to process orders has a VM Listener on the same VM queue. The rest of this flow processes each received item by writing the item to a database.
This Mule application is deployed to four CloudHub workers with persistent queues enabled.
What message processing guarantees are provided by the VM queue and the CloudHub workers, and how are VM messages routed among the CloudHub workers for each invocation of the parent flow under normal operating conditions where all the CloudHub workers remain online?

解説: (JPNTest メンバーにのみ表示されます)
A Mule application uses APIkit for SOAP to implement a SOAP web service. The Mule application has been deployed to a CloudHub worker in a testing environment.
The integration testing team wants to use a SOAP client to perform Integration testing. To carry out the integration tests, the integration team must obtain the interface definition for the SOAP web service.
What is the most idiomatic (used for its intended purpose) way for the integration testing team to obtain the interface definition for the deployed SOAP web service in order to perform integration testing with the SOAP client?

During a planning session with the executive leadership, the development team director presents plans for a new API to expose the data in the company's order database. An earlier effort to build an API on top of this data failed, so the director is recommending a design-first approach.
Which characteristics of a design-first approach will help make this API successful?

解説: (JPNTest メンバーにのみ表示されます)
An organization is designing an integration Mule application to process orders by submitting them to a back- end system for offline processing. Each order will be received by the Mule application through an HTTPS POST and must be acknowledged immediately. Once acknowledged, the order will be submitted to a back- end system. Orders that cannot be successfully submitted due to rejections from the back-end system will need to be processed manually (outside the back-end system).
The Mule application will be deployed to a customer-hosted runtime and is able to use an existing ActiveMQ broker if needed. The ActiveMQ broker is located inside the organization's firewall. The back-end system has a track record of unreliability due to both minor network connectivity issues and longer outages.
What idiomatic (used for their intended purposes) combination of Mule application components and ActiveMQ queues are required to ensure automatic submission of orders to the back-end system while supporting but minimizing manual order processing?

In one of the critical payment related mule application, transaction is being used . As an enhancement to implementation , scatter gather route is introduced which is also the part of transaction group. Scatter gather route has 4 routes.
What will be the behavior of the Mule application in case of error occurs in 4th route of the scatter-gather router and transaction needs to be rolled back?

解説: (JPNTest メンバーにのみ表示されます)
An organization's security policies mandate complete control of the login credentials used to log in to Anypoint Platform. What feature of Anypoint Platform should be used to meet this requirement?

解説: (JPNTest メンバーにのみ表示されます)
Which Exchange asset type represents configuration modules that extend the functionality of an API and enforce capabilities such as security?

解説: (JPNTest メンバーにのみ表示されます)
When the mule application using VM is deployed to a customer-hosted cluster or multiple cloudhub workers, how are messages consumed by the Mule engine?

解説: (JPNTest メンバーにのみ表示されます)
What is the MuleSoft-recommended best practice to share the connector and configuration information among the APIs?

解説: (JPNTest メンバーにのみ表示されます)
An organization has defined a common object model in Java to mediate the communication between different Mule applications in a consistent way. A Mule application is being built to use this common object model to process responses from a SOAP API and a REST API and then write the processed results to an order management system.
The developers want Anypoint Studio to utilize these common objects to assist in creating mappings for various transformation steps in the Mule application.
What is the most idiomatic (used for its intended purpose) and performant way to utilize these common objects to map between the inbound and outbound systems in the Mule application?

A gaming company has implemented an API as a Mule application and deployed the API implementation to a CloudHub 2.0 private space. The API implementation must connect to a mainframe application running in the customer's on-premises corporate data center and also to a Kafka cluster running in an Amazon AWS VPC.
What is the most efficient way to enable the API to securely connect from its private space to the mainframe application and Kafka cluster?

解説: (JPNTest メンバーにのみ表示されます)
One of the backend systems involved by the API implementation enforces rate limits on the number of request a particle client can make.
Both the back-end system and API implementation are deployed to several non-production environments including the staging environment and to a particular production environment. Rate limiting of the back-end system applies to all non-production environments.
The production environment however does not have any rate limiting.
What is the cost-effective approach to conduct performance test of the API implementation in the non- production staging environment?

解説: (JPNTest メンバーにのみ表示されます)

弊社を連絡する

我々は12時間以内ですべてのお問い合わせを答えます。

オンラインサポート時間:( UTC+9 ) 9:00-24:00
月曜日から土曜日まで

サポート:現在連絡