OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 無料問題集「OMG Certified UML Professional 2 (OCUP 2) - Advanced Level」

（A）_name

（B）UML 2.5 no longer includes a nameExpression properly within NamedElements.

（C）S_expression$
_expression
OR
_name:_expressk>n

（D）_expression

（E）S_expression$ OR _name

（A）Alternate graphical concrete syntax for Action elements is not allowed

（B）The modeler should develop a tool-specific set of representations and map them to the standard concrete syntax.

（C）Alternate textual concrete syntax for Action elements is not allowed

（D）The modeler should develop a tool-specific set of representations and map them to the standard abstract syntax.

（A）a5, a6, a5, a3, a2, a10, a11, a12
D a1, a7, a8, a7, an

（B）a6., a3, a1, a7, an

（C）a5, a5, a5. a1. a8, a8, a11

（A）

（B）

（C）

（D）

（A）It must to be the same as a model resulting from the mapping to fUML

（B）It must have the equivalent effect as a model resulting from the mapping to fUML

（C）It can be executed by any UML tool, even those are not fUML-conformant.

（D）It does not have to be conformant to the fUML subset.

（A）Each subclass of Electronic Device Kind must have a set of required Certifications defined.

（B）These are two alternative but incompatible ways to specify Electronic Device Kinds, either as Class
"Electronic Device Kind" or as Specialization of "Electronic Device".

（C）Each subclass of Electronic Device in the shown Generalization Set must have a set of required Certifications defined.

（D）The "Electronic Device Kind" Class and the "Electronic Device Kind" Generalization Set have the same name, but no semantic connection is implied by this.

（A）xx Cattle. xy:Bull. resultCattle

（B）xx:Cow. xy:Cattle. result:Cattle

（C）xx:Cow, xy:CattlG, result;Donor

（D）xxCow. xv Bull. resultCattle

（A）A simple State can be redefined by excluding it in a redefined StateMachine.

（B）A simple State can be redefined as a composite State with one or more Regions.

（C）A simple State cannot be redefined

（D）State Redefinition is not a UML capability.

（A）There is a subtle difference between it and a UML 2.x Model, but only theoretical computer scientists care.

（B）It is always a valid UML 2 x Model

（C）The visual representation resembles a UML 2.x Model, but the underlying Model is a MOF-Model.

（D）It can be a valid UML 2.x Model, when certain limitations are observed.